Suspect Zero

Susan Granger’s review of “Suspect Zero” (Paramount Pictures)

Perhaps there have been just too many serial killer movies this year, like “Twisted” and “Taking Lives,” but everything about this so-called thriller seems overly familiar and tepid. Once a top Dallas FBI Agent, mild-mannered Thomas Mackelway (Aaron Eckhart) is now assigned to a minor-league field work in Albuquerque, where he starts getting threatening faxes from obsessive-compulsive Benjamin O’Ryan (Ben Kingsley), who may or may not be involved with a series of killings that Mackelway is investigating. So his former partner/lover, Fran Kulok (Carrie-Anne Moss), an agent from Dallas, us sent over to help him. It seems O’Ryan, who is also a former G-man, is proficient in the ESP telepathic specialty of “remote viewing,” which allows him to project himself into the guilt-ridden minds of murderers whom he then stalks and kills. He removes their eyelids and leaves a carved symbol – a zero with a slash through it – as his calling card. That refers to O’Ryan’s grisly theory that a serial killer can succeed only if the choice of his victims is random because, without a pattern, there is no trail. The screenplay by Zak Penn and Billy Ray is so crammed with confusing flashbacks and weird, supernatural visions that director W. Elias Merhige (“Shadow of a Vampire”) seems quite overwhelmed by the pulpy obscurity of the cryptic concept. Not to mention the plot loopholes and serious lack of character development. What a waste of acting talent! On the Granger Movie Gauge of 1 to 10, “Suspect Zero” is an eerie, implausible 2. There’s a rumor that the state of New Mexico floated an interest-free, $7.5 million loan for this film production in exchange for 2.5% of the profits and – if that’s true – there could be a strong case for fiscal irresponsibility.

02
Scroll to Top